Present distribution
| Map showing the present distribution of this weed. | ||||
Habitat: “Forest edges, roadsides, watercourses, disturbed sites. Prefers shady to semi-shady situations & well-drained soils… Tolerates frost” (ARC 2007). “Habitat shady areas in and around forest margins, plantations and hedges” (Roy et al 2004). “Grows in sandy soils, usually overlaying sandstone” (Conn 1992). Forest margins (Bond & Goldblatt 1984). “Requires consistently moist soil; do not let dry out between waterings… Sun to partial shade… Average water needs; do not over water” (Dave’s Garden, no date). “A rapidly spreading ground cover in the shade of trees” (Burnie et al 1998). |
Map Overlays Used Land Use: Broadacre cropping; forestry; horticulture perennial; horticulture seasonal; pasture dryland; pasture irrigation Ecological Vegetation Divisions Grassy/heathy dry forest; swampy scrub; lowland forest; forby forest; damp forest; riparian; wet forest; rainforest; granitic hillslopes; rocky outcrop shrubland Colours indicate possibility of Plectranthus ciliatus infesting these areas. In the non-coloured areas the plant is unlikely to establish as the climate, soil or landuse is not presently suitable. |
|
QUESTION | COMMENTS | RATING | CONFIDENCE |
Social | |||
1. Restrict human access? | “Soft, perennial straggling herb or subshrub to c. 60 cm high” (Conn 1992). “Forms thick dense mats [that are] smothering [and] can completely dominate roadsides” (ARC 2007). “Can form a dense understorey in bushland. (NSW, Vic)” (Richardson et al 2006). Could be a high nuisance value, may become too thick to walk through and vehicles may have trouble seeing what terrain they are about to drive over. - High nuisance value, People and/or vehicles access with difficulty. | MH | MH |
2. Reduce tourism? | “Soft, perennial straggling herb or subshrub to c. 60 cm high” (Conn 1992). “Forms thick dense mats [that are] smothering [and] can completely dominate roadsides” (ARC 2007). “Can form a dense understorey in bushland. (NSW, Vic)” (Richardson et al 2006). - Some recreational uses may be affected. | MH | M |
3. Injurious to people? | No mention of spines, prickles, toxic effects (ARC 2007; Shepherd 2004; Connor 1977; Cooper and Johnson 1984). - Not likely to be injurious to people. | L | M |
4. Damage to cultural sites? | “Succulent, spreading, pleasantly aromatic [to] 60 cm high… Flowers (12-15 mm long) are white speckled with purple and in spike-like clusters” (Richardson et al 2006). - Moderate visual effect. | ML | M |
Abiotic | |||
5. Impact flow? | “Grows in sandy soils, usually overlaying sandstone” (Conn 1992). Forest margins (Bond & Goldblatt 1984). “Forest edges, roadsides, watercourses, disturbed sites. Prefers shady to semi-shady situations & well-drained soils” (ARC 2007). “Habitat shady areas in and around forest margins, plantations and hedges” (Roy et al 2004). Not known to grow in aquatic situations. - Little or negligible impact on water flow. | L | MH |
6. Impact water quality? | “Grows in sandy soils, usually overlaying sandstone” (Conn 1992). Forest margins (Bond & Goldblatt 1984). “Forest edges, roadsides, watercourses, disturbed sites. Prefers shady to semi-shady situations & well-drained soils” (ARC 2007). “Habitat shady areas in and around forest margins, plantations and hedges” (Roy et al 2004). Not known to grow in aquatic situations. - No noticeable effect on dissolved O2 or light levels. | L | MH |
7. Increase soil erosion? | “Grows in sandy soils, usually overlaying sandstone” (Conn 1992). “Spreads vegetatively by runners” (Roy et al 2004). As this grows in sandy locations and spreads via runners, it is likely to have a tendency to hold soil together. - Low probability of large scale soil movement. | L | ML |
8. Reduce biomass? | No information. | M | L |
9. Change fire regime? | No information. | M | L |
Community Habitat | |||
10. Impact on composition (a) high value EVC | EVC = Swamp Scrub (E); CMA =West Gippsland; Bioregion = Wilsons Promontory; VH CLIMATE potential. Minor displacement of some dominant or indicator spp. within any one strata/layer (e.g. ground cover, forbs, shrubs & trees). | ML | H |
(b) medium value EVC | EVC = Herb-rich Foothill Forest (D); CMA =Port Phillip and Western Port; Bioregion = Central Victorian Uplands; VH CLIMATE potential. Major displacement of some dominant spp. within a strat/layer (or some dominant spp. within different layers). | MH | H |
(c) low value EVC | EVC = Lowland Forest (LC); CMA = Glenelg Hopkins; Bioregion =Victorian Volcanic Plain; VH CLIMATE potential. Major displacement of some dominant spp. within a strat/layer (or some dominant spp. within different layers). | MH | H |
11. Impact on structure? | “Forms thick dense mats smothering native seedlings & suppressing regeneration. Can completely dominate roadsides” (ARC 2007). “Can form a dense understorey in bushland. (NSW, Vic)” (Richardson et al 2006). - Major effect on < 60% of the floral strata as it can be dominant and form dense understorey. | MH | M |
12. Effect on threatened flora? | “Forms thick dense mats smothering native [New Zealand] seedlings & suppressing regeneration. Can completely dominate roadsides” (ARC 2007). “Can form a dense understorey in bushland. (NSW, Vic)” (Richardson et al 2006). - Direct effect on VROT species unknown. | M | L |
Fauna | |||
13. Effect on threatened fauna? | Unknown if this plant species will co-exist in the same habitat as threatened fauna. | M | L |
14. Effect on non-threatened fauna? | “Forms thick dense mats smothering native seedlings & suppressing regeneration. Can completely dominate roadsides” (ARC 2007). “Can form a dense understorey in bushland. (NSW, Vic)” (Richardson et al 2006). - Habitat could be changed dramatically, leading to the possible extinction of non-threatened species. | H | ML |
15. Benefits fauna? | “Soft, perennial straggling herb or subshrub to c. 60 cm high” (Conn 1992). “Can form a dense understorey in bushland. (NSW, Vic)” (Richardson et al 2006). - No mention of providing food but may provide some assistance in shelter/cover for smaller animals. | MH | M |
16. Injurious to fauna? | No mention of spines, prickles, toxic effects (ARC 2007; Shepherd 2004; Connor 1977; Cooper and Johnson 1984). - Not likely to be injurious to fauna. | L | M |
Pest Animal | |||
17. Food source to pests? | No information. | M | L |
18. Provides harbour? | “Soft, perennial straggling herb or subshrub to c. 60 cm high” (Conn 1992). “Can form a dense understorey in bushland. (NSW, Vic)” (Richardson et al 2006). - May provide shelter as overnight cover for rabbits at least. | MH | M |
Agriculture | |||
19. Impact yield? | No information. | M | L |
20. Impact quality? | No information. | M | L |
21. Affect land value? | No information. | M | L |
22. Change land use? | No information. | M | L |
23. Increase harvest costs? | No information. | M | L |
24. Disease host/vector? | No information. | M | L |
QUESTION | COMMENTS | RATING | CONFIDENCE |
Establishment | |||
1. Germination requirements? | No information. | M | L |
2. Establishment requirements? | “Requires consistently moist soil; do not let dry out between waterings… Sun to partial shade” (Dave’s Garden, no date). “Habitat shady areas in and around forest margins, plantations and hedges” (Roy et al 2004). “Prefers shady to semi-shady situations & well-drained soils” (ARC 2007). “A rapidly spreading ground cover in the shade of trees” (Burnie et al 1998). - Can establish without additional factors. | H | ML |
3. How much disturbance is required? | “Forest edges, roadsides, watercourses, disturbed sites. Prefers shady to semi-shady situations & well-drained soils” (ARC 2007). “Habitat shady areas in and around forest margins, plantations and hedges” (Roy et al 2004). “Grows in sandy soils, usually overlaying sandstone” (Conn 1992). Forest margins (Bond & Goldblatt 1984). Can establish in relatively intact natural ecosystem of watercourse. | MH | M |
Growth/Competitive | |||
4. Life form? | “Spreads vegetatively by runners” (Roy et al 2004). - Geophyte. | ML | MH |
5. Allelopathic properties? | Not listed as an allelopathic plant (Rice 1984). - None. | L | M |
6. Tolerates herb pressure? | No information. | M | L |
7. Normal growth rate? | “A rapidly spreading ground cover in the shade of trees” (Burnie et al 1998). “Forms thick dense mats smothering native seedlings & suppressing regeneration. Can completely dominate roadsides” (ARC 2007). - Indications are that this is a fast growing species that could exceed most other species of the same life form. | H | M |
8. Stress tolerance to frost, drought, w/logg, sal. etc? | “Tolerates frost” (ARC 2007). - Not enough information. | M | L |
Reproduction | |||
9. Reproductive system | “Spreads vegetatively by runners” (Roy et al 2004). P. ciliatus was visited by numerous insects including Amegilla caelestina, Psilodera sp. A, Amegilla bothai and Rhingia sp. (Potgieter 1999). - Vegetatively reproductive and likely to be sexually reproductive also. | H | M |
10. Number of propagules produced? | No information. | M | L |
11. Propagule longevity? | No information. | M | L |
12. Reproductive period? | No information. | M | L |
13. Time to reproductive maturity? | No information. | M | L |
Dispersal | |||
14. Number of mechanisms? | No information. | M | L |
15. How far do they disperse? | No information. | M | L |