Your gateway to a wide range of natural resources information and associated maps

Victorian Resources Online

Impact Assessment - Garden geranium (Pelargonium alchemilloides) in Victoria

Back | Table | Feedback

Assessment of plant invasiveness is done by evaluating biological and ecological characteristics such as germination requirements, growth rate, competitive ability, reproduction methods and dispersal mechanisms. Assessment of plant impacts, however, is determined by the extent to which a plant affects a land manager’s environmental, economic and social resources.

The relative importance of these resources varies depending upon the value people place on them and, as such, the assessment process is subjective. For example, a farmer is likely to place a higher emphasis on the impact of a plant on production (economic resource) than its impact on areas of natural vegetation occurring on the farm. Conversely, a Landcare or Friends group would value environmental or social resources more than economic resources.

Recognising that the value of resources vary between different land tenures, plant impact assessments allow a prioritisation of resources by land managers. Assessments can apply at a local, regional or state level, and the relative values of each resource identified may differ at each level.

The impact assessment method used in the Victorian Pest Plant Prioritisation Process uses three broad resource categories: social, environmental and agricultural, each with a number of related attributes. For example, social resources include such attributes as how the plant affects human access for recreation, or if it creates a health risk due to toxicity or by producing allergens.

Each resource attribute, or criterion, is assessed relative to a list of intensity ratings. Depending upon information found in relation to each criterion, a rating of Low, Medium Low, Medium High or High is assigned. Descriptions of the impact criteria and intensity ratings used in this process can be viewed here.

The following table provides information on the impact of Garden geranium

A more detailed description of the methodology of the Victorian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) method can be viewed below:

Victorian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) method (PDF - 630 KB)
Victorian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) method (DOC - 1 MB)
To view the information PDF requires the use of a PDF reader. This can be installed for free from the Adobe website (external link).

Common Name: Garden geranium
Scientific name: Pelargonium alchemilloides

Question
Comments
Reference
Rating
Recreation
1. Restrict human access?Decumbent herb…usually 20 cm tall (van der Walt, 1977). Will not restrict human access.
L
MH
2. Reduce tourism?This small, herbaceous species (van der Walt, 1977) is very unlikely to be obvious to the average visitor.
L
M
3. Injurious to people?Silky leaves, no injurious properties noted in van der Walt (1977).
L
MH
4. Damage to cultural sites?This small, herbaceous species (van der Walt, 1977) would have a negligible effect on aesthetics of cultural sites.
L
M
Abiotic
5. Impact flow?Habitats indicate that this is a terrestrial species (Kokwaro, 1971).
L
MH
6. Impact water quality?Habitats indicate that this is a terrestrial species (Kokwaro, 1971).
L
MH
7. Increase soil erosion?This plant can dominate understorey species and when it becomes dormant (CRC Weed Management, 2003) it could leave large bare patches of soil that has a moderate probability of large scale soil movement.
L
M
8. Reduce biomass?The ability of this small plant (van der Walt, 1977) to dominate understorey species (CRC Weed Management, 2003)will decrease biomass as the smaller plant replaces larger ones.
MH
MH
9. Change fire regime?The ability of this herbaceous plant (van der Walt, 1977) to dominate understorey species (CRC Weed Management, 2003) means that it has the potential to replace high fuel loads, such as grasses, with low fuel loads of herbaceous species. This could have a moderate effect on fire frequency and intensity.
MH
M
Community Habitat
10. Impact on composition
(a) high value EVC
EVC=Ridged Plains Mallee (E), CMA=Mallee, Bioreg.=Lowan Mallee, CLIMATE=VH.
“Dominance of understorey species in the peppermint woodland” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). Major displacement of
some dominant species within a layer.
MH
M
(b) medium value EVCEVC=Semi-arid Woodland (D), CMA=Mallee, Bioreg.=Lowan Mallee, CLIMATE=VH.
“Dominance of understorey species in the peppermint woodland” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). Major displacement of
some dominant species within a layer.
MH
M
(c) low value EVCEVC=Woorinen Sands Mallee (LC), CMA=Mallee, Bioreg.=Lowan Mallee, CLIMATE=VH.
“Dominance of understorey species in the peppermint woodland” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). Major displacement of some dominant species within a layer.
MH
M
11. Impact on structure?“Dominance of understorey species in the peppermint woodland” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). This plant has the potential for a major effect on the groundcover layer.
MH
M
12. Effect on threatened flora?12. Effect on threatened flora?No information found.
MH
L
Fauna
13. Effect on threatened fauna?No information found.
MH
L
14. Effect on non-threatened fauna?The ability of this plant to dominate understorey species (CRC Weed Management, 2003) means that it has the potential to reduce the food sources for fauna, leading locally to reduced numbers.
MH
M
15. Benefits fauna?No information found.
M
L
16. Injurious to fauna?Silky leaves, no injurious properties noted in van der Walt (1977).
L
MH
Pest Animal
17. Food source to pests?No information found.
M
L
18. Provides harbor?This small, herbaceous species (van der Walt, 1977) is very unlikely to provide harbour for pest animals.
L
MH
Agriculture
19. Impact yield?“Not currently seen as a threat to agriculture, [but] it could have an impact on agricultural production…Could degrade pastoral areas.” Its ability to dominate understorey species (CRC Weed Management, 2003) and occurrence in grassland (Kokwaro, 1971) suggests that this plant has the potential to reduce the carrying capacity of pasture by more than 5%.
MH
MH
20. Impact quality?This small, herbaceous species (van der Walt, 1977) is very unlikely to reduce the quality of produce.
L
MH
21. Affect land value?This small, herbaceous species (van der Walt, 1977) is very unlikely to impact on land value.
L
MH
22. Change land use?If infestations degraded pastoral areas enough to make them unprofitable (see Q 19), a change to cropping may be necessary.
MH
MH
23. Increase harvest costs?Not predicted to be a weed of cropping (CRC Weed Management, 2003).
L
M
24. Disease host/vector?Not noted as a disease host/vector in CRC Weed Management (2003).
L
M

This table can also be viewed as a PDF document (printer friendly).

Impact Assessment Record - Garden geranium (PDF - 21KB)
Impact Assessment Record - Garden geranium (DOC - 60KB) (DOC - 60KB)
To view the information PDF requires the use of a PDF reader. This can be installed for free from the Adobe website (external link).

Feedback

Do you have additional information about this plant that will improve the quality of the assessment?
If so, we would value your contribution. Click on the link to go to the feedback form.
Page top