Your gateway to a wide range of natural resources information and associated maps

Victorian Resources Online

EGC216

Location: Gelantipy

Australian Soil Classification: Haplic, Eutrophic, Red FERROSOL (Stony)

Map Unit: Gelantipy (Component 1)
Previous Site Name: EG216

General Landscape Description: Plateau
Site Description: Gently undulating plain, <2% slope, few (2 - 10%) scattered rounded basalt stones (200 – 600 mm)
Land Use: Grazing
Native Vegetation: Montane grassy woodland
Geology: Tertiary basalt


Soils and landforms of the Buchan and Suggan Buggan region -Gelantipy EG216 landscape


Soil Profile Morphology:


A110 – 20 cmDark reddish brown (5YR3/4); heavy clay loam; strong fine granular structure; common subrounded cobbles; weak consistence moist; pH 5.8; gradual change to:
Soils and landforms of the Buchan and Suggan Buggan region -Gelantipy EG216 profile
A1220 – 40 cmDark red (2.5YR3/6); light clay; strong fine polyhedral structure; many subrounded cobbles; firm consistence dry; pH 6.0; gradual change to:
B240 -70 cmRed (2.5YR4/6); medium clay; strong medium polyhedral structure; abundant subrounded stones (200 – 600 mm); firm consistence dry; becoming too rocky to excavate; pH 5.7.

Key Profile Features:

  • Shallow depth to rock.
  • Gradual increase in clay content down the soil profile.

Soil Profile Characteristics:

-

pH
Salinity
Surface soil
(A11 horizon)
Moderately acid
Very low
Non Sodic
None
Subsoil
(A12 horizon)
Moderately acid
Very low
Non Sodic
None
Deeper Subsoil
(40-70 cm)
Moderately acid
Very low
Non Sodic
None



Chemical and Physical Analysis:

Horizon
Horizon Depth
(cm)
pH
(water)
pH
(CaCl
2)
EC
dS/m
Organic Carbon
%
Total
Nitrogen
%
Exchangeable Aluminium
ppm
Exchangeable Acididty
meq/100g
Exchangeable Cations
Coarse Sand
(0.2-2.0 mm)
%
Fine Sand
(0.02-0.2 mm)
%
Silt
(0.002-0.02 mm)
%
Clay
(<0.002 mm)
%
Field Capacity
% w/w
Wilting Point
% w/w
Ca
Mg
K
Na
meq/100g
A11
0-20
5.8
4.9
0.05
4.3
0.28
<10
13
8.1
4.6
0.18
0.27
9
27
20
33
41.6
17.9
A12
20-40
6.0
4.9
<0.05
1.1
0.5
27
12
5.3
7.0
<0.05
0.3
7
22
24
40
46.8
21.4
B2
40-70
5.7
4.5
<0.05
0.53
<0.5
130
14
4.6
11.0
<0.05
0.68
9
20
22
45
55.3
28.3



Management Considerations

Whole profile
  • The profile is moderately acid throughout.
  • These soils are very well drained due to their strongly developed subsoil structure. This is due to the high iron oxide content which, although not measured in the laboratory, is likely to exceed 5% in the subsoil.
  • Plant available water capacity is considered to be low, estimated at 61 mm based on the laboratory data, the presence of cobbles and stones in the subsoil and the shallow nature of the soil.

Surface (A) horizons
  • The soil has moderate to high organic matter content, estimated at 7.3% which gives the soil its strongly developed structure.
  • The nutrient holding capacity of the soil is high (based on the sum of the exchangeable basic cations).
  • Potassium levels are very low and a strong response to potassium fertilisers would be expected.
  • Due to their anticipated high iron oxide contents based on their strong ‘red’ colour and basaltic origin, these soils tend to ‘fix’ phosphorus which makes it unavailable to plants. Regular phosphorus application will assist in overcoming such a deficiency. Addition of molybdenum may also be required and this can be assessed by plant tissue analysis of clover. Zinc and copper can also be 'fixed' by high iron oxide contents.

Subsoil (B) horizon
  • The friable nature of the subsoil allows good penetration of plant roots until rock is encountered.
  • The friable nature of the subsoil together with the shallow depth to rock would lead to problems with sealing of earth dams.
  • The subsurface soil has high levels of exchangeable aluminium (130 ppm) and is moderately acidic. This could restrict the growth of deep-rooted aluminium sensitive species, such as lucerne, as aluminium and manganese toxicity may occur. There should be likely long term benefits of applying lime, preferably incorporated, on this site if the test results are representative of the paddock. A pH/aluminium test is, however, best performed from samples taken across the paddock and bulked together. Other factors need to be considered, however, before lime is recommended (eg. pasture species grown, method of application, local trial responses, soil surface structure and likely cost/benefit).


Profile Described By: Heather Adams, Julieanne Sargant, and Ian Sargeant, June 2009.
Page top