Your gateway to a wide range of natural resources information and associated maps

Victorian Resources Online

EGC200

Location: Bindi

Australian Soil Classification: Haplic, Lithocalcic, Red DERMOSOL

Map Unit: Bindi (Component 1)
Previous Site Name: EG200

General Landscape Description: Undulating low hills
Site description: Upper north facing slope
Land Use: Grazing on annual pasture
Native Vegetation: Grassy woodland
Geology: Devonian limestone


Soils and landforms of the Omeo/Benambra and Tambo Valley region - soil-landform unit Bindi EG200 landscape



Soil Profile Morphology:


Surface soil

Soils and landforms of the Omeo/Benambra and Tambo Valley region - soil-landform unit Bindi EG200 profile
A10 – 17 cmDark brown (7.5YR3/2); clay loam; moderate fine (2 – 5 mm) granular structure; firm consistence dry; clear change to:
Subsoil

B2117 – 30 cmReddish brown (2.5YR4/4); medium clay; strong medium (10 – 20 mm) polyhedral structure; very firm consistence dry; few (2 – 10 %) angular limestone pebbles (up to 10 mm in size); gradual change to:
B2230 – 40 cmRed (2.5YR4/6); medium clay; strong medium (10 – 20 mm) angular blocky structure; very firm consistence dry; many (20 – 50%) angular tabular limestone pebbles (up to 20 mm in size); gradual change to:
B2340 – 55 cmRed (2.5YR4/6); medium clay; very firm consistence dry; abundant (50 – 90 %) angular tabular limestone pebbles (up to 60 mm in size); clear change to:
R55 – 110+ cmFractured limestone becoming impenetrable with depth.



Key profile features
  • Lack of texture contrast between the surface (A) horizon and the subsoil (B) horizon.
  • The shallow occurrence of limestone rock.

Soil Profile Characteristics:

-

pH
Salinity
Surface soil
(A1 horizon)
Strongly Acid
Very Low
Non-sodic
None
Subsoil
(B21 horizon)
Moderately Acid
Very Low
Non-sodic
None
Deeper subsoil
Slightly Acid
Very Low
Non-sodic
None


Chemical and Physical Analysis:

Horizon
Horizon Depth
(cm)
pH
(water)
pH
(CaCl
2)
EC
dS/m
Organic Carbon
%
Total
Nitrogen
%
Exchangeable Aluminium
ppm
Exchangeable Acididty
meq/100g
Exchangeable Cations
Coarse Sand
(0.2-2.0 mm)
%
Fine Sand
(0.02-0.2 mm)
%
Silt
(0.002-0.02 mm)
%
Clay
(<0.002 mm)
%
Field Capacity
% w/w
Wilting Point
% w/w
Ca
Mg
K
Na
meq/100g
A1
0-17
5.3
4.6
0.11
4.3
0.38
<10
9.5
7.3
1.5
0.74
0.085
8
18
23
41
34.5
15.5
B21
17-30
5.9
4.7
0.06
1.5
0.14
<10
6.8
8
2.9
0.5
0.11
6
10
11
66
30.6
17.0
B22
30-40
6.2
5.7
<0.05
1.3
12
7.5
8.7
4
0.33
0.15
2
7
16
70
31.8
19.7
B3
40-55
6.2
6.6
<0.05
0.61
14
5.8
8.3
3.9
0.29
0.14
13
7
27
50
24.4
13.9


Management Considerations

Whole profile
  • Plant available water here is considered to be moderate. Because of the variability in the depth of soil cover within this mapping unit, many soils will have low to very low water-holding capacity. Effective rooting depth is limited to the depth to rock.
Surface (A) horizons
  • The surface soil here is strongly acid. This is inconsistent given the presence of lime in the subsoil. Lime is added to acid soils is to increase the availability of phosphorus and molybdenum so if soil tests taken across the paddock show the soils are deficient, superphosphate should be applied. If no response is observed, lime may used to alleviate the problem.
  • The soils are low in soluble salts.
  • Potassium levels are moderate and plant responses to potassium fertiliser are unlikely given the present grazing management practices.
  • The nutrient holding capacities of the surface (A1 and B21) horizons are moderate (based on the sum of the exchangeable calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium cations).
Subsoil (B) horizons
  • The subsoil would be relatively well drained as there is no sharp increase in clay content at the A/B boundary. The subsoil horizons are non-sodic and not coarsely structured, which will enable plant roots to penetrate easily until they reach rock.

Profile Described By: Heather Adams, Julieanne Sargant and Ian Sargeant, June 2009.

Page top