Purpose of Report | Trend Summary | Post Sowing 2011 Report | Recommendations | References Mallee Soil Erosion and Land Management Survey - Post Sowing 2011 (PDF 757KB) Mallee Soil Erosion and Land Management Survey - Post Sowing 2011 (DOC 1133KB) To view the information PDF requires the use of a PDF reader. This can be installed for free from the Adobe website (external link). |
Site Locations The following is a list of the land systems and transects within each land system where the soil erosion monitoring occurs (See Figure 3). Central Mallee
| Figure 3: Map of the 157 sites where the soil erosion monitoring is being conducted. |
Vegetation Cover and Height Measurements Vegetation cover was measured using the levy point sampler (Levy & Madden, 1993) (refer to Figure 4). 20 random sites in the one hectare area were sampled to record vegetation cover and vegetation height (200 points). The sampler was placed on the ground (i.e. without looking) 20 times within the 1 hectare sampling area. Five paces south/north then five paces east/west were taken, then recordings taken, and repeated until 20 samples were completed. Vegetation height measurement was recorded by a 40 cm ruler attached to the side of the levy point sampler. The height of the closest piece of vegetation (live or dead) to the ruler was measured in centimetres (rounding off to whole number). Vegetation measurements were achieved by counting dead or live vegetation touching the prongs on the levy point sampler. | Figure 4: Levy point sampler used for assessing vegetation cover |
Chemical Fallow | Land kept free of live vegetation with the use of herbicides with no mechanical disturbance |
Conventional Fallow | Land kept free of live vegetation with the use of mechanical cultivation. Visual of up turned earth. |
Pasture -Volunteer | Land dominated by random grasses/cereal for grazing |
Pasture - Improved | Land dominated by annual broadleaf and/or legume (i.e. clover/ vetch/ medic) used for grazing or green and brown manuring. |
Hay | Pasture that has been prepared for hay by evidence of cutting, windrowing or baling. Obvious cut stems on vegetation or evidence of raked vegetation on ground. |
Cereal Crop | Wheat, Barley, Oats, Triticale etc |
Legume Crop | Field peas, Vetch, Lupins, Beans etc |
Oilseed Crop | Canola, Mustard etc |
Other | Saltbush etc |
Conventional Farming | A system of multiple cultivation control. Passes before sowing for weed and/or seedbed preparation |
No-Till/ Minimal Till | Sowing system aimed at minimising soil disturbance and retaining crop residues |
Detachment Rating | Stability | Description |
1 | Stable | No significant disturbance |
2 | Slightly to moderately unstable | Partial soil surface disturbance by:
|
Includes any land which has been cultivated at least once:
| ||
Also includes land with new crop, up until late tillering:
| ||
Also includes crops beyond tillering stage | ||
| ||
3 | Very unstable | Complete soil disturbance by cultivation or heavy grazing (or both).
|
Such disturbance by grazing alone would normally occur only on sand |
Team | Day | Transect | No of sites |
1 | 1 2 | Ouyen Piangil Ouyen Piangil | 12 13 |
2 | 1 2 | Torrita Ouyen Piangil | 13 13 |
3 | 1 2 | Tutye Murrayville | 13 14 |
4 | 1 2 | Millewa Millewa | 10 10 |
5 | 1 2 | Sea Lake - Ultima - Swan Hill Sea Lake - Ultima - Swan Hill & Culgoa - Lalbert | 15 13 |
6 | 1 2 | Gama - Yaapeet Gypsum - Gama & Hopetoun _ Woomelang | 14 19 |
dry aggregates | >50% | 30-50% | 10-30% | <10% |
groundcover | ||||
>70% | low | low | low | low |
50-70% | low | low | low | medium |
30-50% | low | low | medium | high |
18-30% | low | medium | high | high |
<10% | medium | high | high | high |
Land System | Cereal Crop | Chemical Fallow | Conventional Fallow | Improved Pasture | Legume Crop | Oilseed Crop | Volunteer Pasture |
Boigbeat | 90.0% (9) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 10.0% (1) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) |
Central Mallee | 58.4% (45) | 5.2% (4) | 0.0% (0) | 1.3% (1) | 3.9% (3) | 6.5% (5) | 24.7% (19) |
Culgoa | 58.8% (10) | 5.9% (1) | 5.9% (1) | 5.9% (1) | 5.9% (1) | 5.9% (1) | 11.8% (2) |
Hopetoun | 30.4% (7) | 0.0% (0) | 8.7% (2) | 0.0% (0) | 39.1% (9) | 8.7% (2) | 13.0% (3) |
Millewa | 75.0% (15) | 5.0% (1) | 5.0% (1) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 15.0% (3) |
Tempy | 80.0% (8) | 0.0% (0) | 10.0% (1) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 10.0% (1) | 0.0% (0) |
Total | 59.9 (94) | 3.8 (6) | 3.2 (5) | 1.3 (2) | 8.9 (14) | 5.7 (9) | 17.2 (27) |
Of the cropped sites surveyed, 17.19% were being managed with conventional farming practices and 57.96% were being managed with no-till/minimal till (Figure 6, Table 7). Table 7: Percentage and number of cropped sites in conventional and no-till/minimal farming land management practice.
| Figure 5: Percentage of the sites under different land management phases, observed during the post sowing 2011 survey. |
Figure 6: Percent of cropped sites observed with conventional and no-till/minimal till farm practices recorded during the post sowing survey 2011. | Figure 7: Percentage of sites with livestock absent/present, observed during the post sowing 2011 survey. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vegetation Measurements The post sowing 2011 survey reported that 26.12 % of the surveyed sites had greater than 70% vegetation cover and 22.93% had coverage from 50 - 70 % rating these sites at low risk of erosion. Eight (5.09%) survey sites reported less than 10% coverage, rating these sites at high risk of erosion (Figure 8 and Table 8). Table 8: The percent (and number) of sites by land system recorded vegetation cover during the post sowing 2011 survey.
| Figure 8: Percentage of vegetation cover at sites surveyed for the Mallee Soil Erosion and Land Management Survey, results from the post sowing 2011. |
LandSystem | Low | Medium | High |
Boigbeat | 100% (10) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
Central Mallee | 100% (77) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
Culgoa | 100% (17) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
Hopetoun | 95.66% (22) | 0% (0) | 4.34% (1) |
Millewa | 65.00% (13) | 35.00% (7) | 0% (0) |
Tempy | 90.00% (9) | 10.00% (1) | 0% (0) |
Total | 94.26% (148) | 5.09% (8) | 0.63% (1) |
LandSystem | Low | Medium | High |
Boigbeat | 100% (10) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
Central Mallee | 98.70% (76) | 1.30% (1) | 0% (0) |
Culgoa | 82.35% (14) | 17.64% (3) | 0% (0) |
Hopetoun | 91.30% (21) | 4.34% (1) | 4.34% (1) |
Millewa | 45.00% (9) | 35.00% (7) | 20.00% (4) |
Tempy | 80.00% (8) | 20.00% (2) | 0% (0) |
Total | 87.89% (138) | 8.92% (14) | 3.19% (5) |
LandSystem | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Boigbeat | 90.00% (9) | 10.00% (1) | 0% (0) |
Central Mallee | 85.71% (66) | 64.70% (11) | 0% (0) |
Culgoa | 64.70% (11) | 23.52% (4) | 11.76% (2) |
Hopetoun | 78.26% (18) | 13.04% (3) | 8.69% (2) |
Millewa | 60.00% (12) | 25.00% (5) | 15.00 % (3) |
Tempy | 30.00% (3) | 40.00% (4) | 30.00% (3) |
Total | 75.79% (119) | 17.84% (28) | 6.37% (10) |
The results from the three different methods of erosion risk recorded similar results. Q value (Table 9), soil erosion risk matrix (Table 10) and assessment of soil stability (Table 11) results were based on 157 recorded active sites in the data base. Results from Q value (Table 10) indicated that 94.26% (148 sites) were at a low risk of erosion and recorded only one site (0.63%) with a high risk of erosion. Soil erosion risk matrix (Table 10) indicated 87.89% (138 sites) were at a low risk of erosion, with 8.92% (14 sites) is at medium risk and 3.19% (5 sites) of the sites at a high risk of erosion. Assessment of soil stability (Table 11) recorded 75.79% (119 sites) were at a low risk of erosion and 17.83% (28 sites) were at a medium risk and 6.36% (10 sites) at high risk of erosion. Results from the Q value and soil erosion matrix were more closely aligned than the results from the assessment of soil stability. Both the Q value and soil erosion matrix methods are based on actual measurements of soil dry aggregate and vegetation cover whereas the soil stability measurement is a visual record with the potential for greater variation in the results making it a less accurate assessment. | Figure 9: Risk of erosion recorded from the post sowing 2011 Mallee soil erosion and land management survey. |