Back | Table | Feedback
Plant invasiveness is determined by evaluating a plant’s biological and ecological characteristics against criteria that encompass establishment requirements, growth rate and competitive ability, methods of reproduction, and dispersal mechanisms.
Each characteristic, or criterion, is assessed against a list of intensity ratings. Depending upon information found, a rating of Low, Medium Low, Medium High or High is assigned to that criterion. Where no data is available to answer a criterion, a rating of medium (M) is applied. A description of the invasiveness criteria and intensity ratings used in this process can be viewed here. |
Question | Comments | Rating | Confidence |
Establishment | |||
Germination requirements? | “Late Autumn to winter” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). Natural seasonal disturbance. | MH | M |
Establishment requirements? | “Has become a naturalised weed in peppermint woodland…and has the ability to invade intact vegetation” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). This suggests that it can establish under moderate canopy cover. | MH | M |
How much disturbance is required? | “Often found in disturbed areas” (van der Walt, 1977), but has the ability to invade intact vegetation (CRC Weed Management, 2003). Establishes in relatively intact vegetation. | MH | M |
Growth/Competitive | |||
Life form? | “Low, sprawling plant…[with] an underground tuber up to 6 m in length” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). Geophyte. | ML | MH |
Allelopathic properties? | No information found. | M | L |
Tolerates herb pressure? | No information found. | M | L |
Normal growth rate? | No information found. | M | L |
Stress tolerance to frost, drought, w/logg, sal. etc? | “Can grow in…drought prone areas” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). No further information found. One study recorded garden geranium in more than 2/3 of unburnt treatment plots, but not recorded in burnt plots (Uys, Bond & Everson, 2004). | M | L |
Reproduction | |||
Reproductive system | “Tuber (rhizome) or seed” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). | H | MH |
Number of propagules produced? | “Prolific seed producer” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). Inflorescence may have up to 15 flowers (van der Walt, 1977) No further information found. | M | L |
Propagule longevity? | “It is possible for seeds to remain viable in the soil for a long period of time” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). No further information found. | M | L |
Reproductive period? | “A single plant will die out after a few years” (CRC Weed Management, 2003). | MH | M |
Time to reproductive maturity? | “Flowering…follows the regrowth period” (CRC Weed Management, 2003) suggesting that garden geranium flowers in its second year. | MH | M |
Dispersal | |||
Number of mechanisms? | Seeds appear suited to wind dispersal (photo in CRC Weed Management, 2003). | MH | M |
How far do they disperse? | No information found. | M | L |
Feedback
Do you have additional information about this plant that will improve the quality of the assessment?
If so, we would value your contribution. Click on the link to go to the feedback form.