Your gateway to a wide range of natural resources information and associated maps

Victorian Resources Online

GP63

Location: Heyfield.Australian Soil Classification: Vertic, Mesonatric, Brown SODOSOL.
Great Soil Group: Solodised solonetz.Geology: Mid Pleistocene terrace.
General Landscape Description: Level plain. Mapping Unit: Stratford.
Site Description: Grazing paddock. Native Vegetation: Original vegetation included forest red gum (E. tereticornis).

Photo: Site G63 Landscape
Site GP63 Landscape

Soil Profile Morphology:

Surface Soil

A10-2 cmDark brown (10YR3/3); fine sandy loam; pH 5.4; sharp change to:
Photo: Site G63 Profile
Site GP63 Profile


Photo: Site G63 Columnar Structure
Note: Columnar structure in upper
B horizon with associated
bleached capping.
A212-10 cm Yellowish brown (10YR5/4); conspicuously bleached (7.5YR7/2d); fine sandy loam; massive structure; very firm consistence dry; pH 6.0; clear and wavy change to:
A22 10-15 cmPale Brown (10YR6/3); conspicuously bleached (10YR8/1d); fine sandy loam; massive very firm consistence dry; sharp change to:
Subsoil
B1 15-25cmYellowish brown (10YR5/4) with a few (<10%) light yellowish brown (10YR5/8) mottles; light clay; moderate coarse columnar and prismatic, parting to strong coarse blocky structure; strong consistence dry; contains few (2%) sub-rounded manganese segregations (2-6 mm in size) as well as a few (<2%) quartz fragments (2-6 mm in size); pH 6.8; gradual change to:
B2125-50 cmYellowish brown (10YR5/6) with a few (<10%) light yellowish brown (10YR5/8) mottles; medium clay; moderate coarse columnar and prismatic, parting to strong coarse blocky structure; strong consistence dry; contains a few (2-5%) sub-rounded manganese segregations (2-6 mm in size); pH 7.2; gradual change to:
B2250-90 cmYellowish brown (10YR5/6); medium clay; moderate coarse prismatic, parting to strong coarse blocky structure; very firm consistence moist; contains a few (2%) sub-rounded manganese segregations (2-6 mm in size); pH 7.6; gradual change to:
B23 90+ cmLight olive brown (2.5Y5/6); light clay; some lenticular structure and slickensides evident; very firm consistence moist; pH 7.9.
Key Profile Features:
  • Strong texture contrast between surface (A) horizons and upper subsoil (B21) horizon.
  • Conspicuously bleached subsurface (A2) horizons.
  • Columnar structure in upper subsoil.
  • Vertic properties present within the deeper subsoil (i.e. slickensides and lenticular structure).
Soil Profile Characteristics:

Horizon
pH
Salinity Rating
Surface
(A1 horizon)
Strongly Acid
Moderate
Non-sodic
None
Subsoil
(B21 horizon)
Slightly Alkaline
Low
Strongly Sodic
Complete
Deeper subsoil
(at 90 cm)
Slightly Alkaline
Moderate
Strongly Sodic
Complete


Graph: pH levels in Site G63





The surface soil is strongly acid.
The subsoil is slightly alkaline.
Graph: Sodicity levels in Site G63



The surface soil is non-sodic.
he subsoil is strongly sodic
throughout.
Graph: Salinity levels in Site G63



The surface salinity rating is
moderate. The subsoil rating
is low becoming moderate at
depth.
Graph: Clay% in Site G63



The clay content increases sharply
at 25 cm depth.

Horizon
Horizon Depth
(cm)
pH
(water)
pH
(CaCl2)
EC 1:5
NaCl
Exchangeable Cations
Ca
Mg
K
Na
meq/100g
A1
0-2
5.4
4.8
0.26
<0.03
9.3
1.9
0.7
0.2
A21
2-10
6
5.3
0.18
4.7
1
0.17
0.51
A22
10-15
B1
15-25
6.8
5.9
0.12
2.8
3
0.11
.073
B21
25-50
7.2
6.3
0.22
3
7.9
0.2
2
B22
50-90
7.6
6.7
0.41
0.08
0.9
7
0.2
2.7
B23
90+
7.9
7.1
0.55
0.1
0.8
8
0.2
3.4

Horizon
Horizon Depth
(cm)
Exchangeable Aluminium
mg/kg
Exchangeable Acidity
meq/100g
Field Capacity
pF2.5
Wilting Point
pF4.2
Coarse Sand
(0.2-2.0 mm)
Fine Sand
(0.02-0.2 mm)
Silt
(0.002-0.02 mm)
Clay
(<0.002 mm)
A1
0-2
<10
12
13.2
A21
2-10
<10
3.1
5.7
7
41
34
13
A22
10-15
B1
15-25
6.9
9
37
32
21
B21
25-50
15.2
6
23
27
44
B22
50-90
13
8
29
27
37
B23
90+
14.8
4
23
30
42

Management Considerations:

Whole Profile
  • Plant Available Water Capacity (PAWC) is considered to be very low (estimated at 20 mm) for this soil profile. This is based on an estimated effective rooting depth of 15 cm (i.e. surface horizons). The dense and coarsely structured upper subsoil is likely to significantly restrict rooting depth. PAWC has been estimated using a model developed by Littleboy (1995) which uses analytical data for clay %, silt %, fine sand %, coarse sand % and wilting point.
Surface (A) Horizons
  • The shallow surface soil is strongly acid. This indicates that aluminium and manganese toxicity could occur. However, the level of exchangeable aluminium measured for this pit site is quite low (<10 mg/kg) and unlikely to restrict the growth of aluminium sensitive species. Lime can be used to increase soil pH but it should be noted that a pH/aluminium test is best performed from samples taken across the paddock and bulked together. Other factors also need to be considered before lime is recommended (e.g. pasture species grown, method of application, local trial responses, soil surface structure and likely cost/benefit).
  • Deficiencies in molybdenum and phosphorus may occur in the strongly acid surface soil. Manganese toxicity may also occur particularly when poorly drained (as waterlogging may bring manganese into solution).
  • The surface (A1) horizon has a moderate nutrient holding capacity (based on the sum of the exchangeable calcium, magnesium and potassium cations). Organic matter is important for enhancing soil fertility, water holding capacity and soil structural condition. This is important at this site where only a shallow surface horizon overlays a bleached subsurface horizon of low fertility.
  • The presence of bleaching in the subsurface (A2) horizon indicates that periodic waterlogging occurs above the more slowly permeable subsoil. This horizon will become ‘spewy’ when waterlogged.
Subsoil (B) Horizons

The dense and coarsely structured upper subsoil is strongly sodic and has a low calcium to magnesium ratio (0.4). Complete dispersion occurs as a result, and root and water movement is likely to be significantly restricted. The upper subsoil also has coarse columnar structure, which will provide a physical barrier to root movement. Deep ripping with gypsum application, has been advocated by some researchers as an effective ameliorating technique for sodic subsoils. However, the use of gypsum may not be economically viable. Any deep ripping should not be carried out when the subsoil is in a moist to wet condition.
  • The presence of mottling throughout the subsoil indicates imperfect drainage.
  • The level of soluble salts below 90 cm depth becomes moderate but is only likely to affect deep rooted salt sensitive species.
  • The deeper subsoil displays vertic properties (i.e. slickensides and lenticular structure). This indicates that significant shrinking and swelling occurs during wetting and drying cycles. This may have some engineering implications (e.g. disturbance to fence lines).
Profile Described By: Mark Imhof, David Rees and Ian Sargeant (21/04/1998).
Page top