Your gateway to a wide range of natural resources information and associated maps

Victorian Resources Online

HDLN Soil and Water Dairy Action Program - Soil Characterisation

Project Introduction

Through the use of selected soil physical and chemical properties, and visual assessment of soil structure and biota in the field this project aimed to benchmark the soil health of dairy farms in the In this research project, we aimed to benchmark the soil health on dairy farms in the Curdies River catchment. Emphasis was placed on the Scott’s Creek/Cooriemungle sub-catchments.

A total of 24 properties were sampled between 2005 and 2007. These farms represented the major landscape components in the catchment. On each of these farms, three paddocks, 2–3 sites within each of 3 paddocks were chosen for monitoring.


Methodology

During late October and early November 2005, intact soil cores were taken from each of the 30 monitor paddocks. Ten cores were taken along a transect at 10 m intervals, resulting in a total of 300 intact cores. The cores were taken in the field by first removing the pasture mat and then driving a PVC pipe (5 cm high and 7 cm diameter) into the ground.

During mid December 2005 to early January 2006, the 30 monitor paddocks were sampled for nutrient status of the surface soil (i.e. 0–10 cm). Paddocks were sampled in 2–3 strata in order to gain an understanding of where high and low nutrient values occur within a paddock. When dividing a paddock for sampling, factors such as animal movement within the paddock, variation in topography, vegetation and obvious drainage lines were taken into consideration. Samples from each strata of the paddock consisted of 30–40 sub-samples taken with a foot sampler. One to 2 hand-auger holes were made in each paddock to get some idea of depth to subsoil.

In October 2006 and 2007, 2–3 monitoring sites (10 m by 10 m) per paddock were selected to cover the range of expected soil physical conditions e.g low-lying vs. well-drained areas, high stock density vs. low stock density). In October 2006 and 2007, 30 sub-samples were taken with a foot sampler, from the same 10 m by 10 m monitoring sites used for the soil physical analyses. In the middle of each monitoring sites, a hand-augered hole to about 1m deep was used to give a full description of the soil profile.

For the intact cores, three 30 cm square quadrants were randomly located within the monitoring site. The intact soil core was collected using a single brass cylinder (73 mm diameter and 47 mm high).

The soil samples were analysed for pH in water and 0.01 M CaCl2, electrical conductivity (EC) (1:5 soil:water), total nitrogen (N), Olsen phosphorus (P), Skene potassium (K), CPC sulphur (S), total carbon (C), and exchangeable aluminium (Al), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K) and sodium (Na). Exchangeable acidity was also measured in 2005 only, while phosphorus buffering index was included in 2006 and 2007. Laboratory analyses also included physical tests such as slaking, dispersion and field texture.

Analyses undertaken were: volumetric soil water content as received, volumetric soil water content at 0 kPa, 1 kPa and 10 kPa tensions, bulk density, and air-filled porosity at 10 kPa tension.


Soil Health Benchmarks

Benchmarks for the main soil health parameters tested are suggested in Table 1, to assist farmers and service providers relate technical data to soil health.

DAV 12222 Final Report

Table 1. Soil health benchmarks.

Soil Health ParameterOptimum Moderate Too High or Too Low
Bulk density (Mg/m3)1.1–1.31.3–1.4> 1.4 or < 1.1
Air-filled porosity (%)
(at 10 kPa)
> 1510–15< 10
Olsen P (mg/kg)16–2511–15 or 26–30<11 or >30
Total carbon (%)>3.12–3.1<2
pHCa4.7–6.54.3–4.7 or 6.5–7.6<4.3 or >7.6
ECe (dS/m)<1.81.8–3.8>3.8
ESP (%)<6>6
Skene K (mg/kg)150–200100–150 or 200–250<100 or >250
CPC S (mg/kg)9–124–8 or 13–20<4 or >20
Exchangeable Al (mg/kg)0–1010–20>20


Soil Profile Description

As well as the characterisation of the surface soil (0-10 cm), soil profiles were examined to the top of the subsoil in Year 1 and to a depth of approximately 1 metre in Years 2 and 3. This report contains the descriptions of soil profiles complete with landscape and profile photos where relevant

YearSties
20051 - 71
200672 - 114
2007115 - 158


Method

In each paddock three profiles were described; to the upper subsoil in Year 1 and to a depth of approximately 100 cm (1 metre) in Years 2 and 3. These sites were associated with where the surface samples were taken.
The profiles were dug by first removing a square surface sod by spade and then augering to about 100cm.

Each auger-full was laid out in sequence according to the measured depth of the hole and laid out on a ground sheet, thereby creating an approximation of a soil profile.

Standard morphological descriptions were carried out as per standard texts such as the Australian Soil Classification (Isbell et al), The Factual Key for describing Australian soils (Northcote) and the Australian Soil and Land Field Handbook (National Committee on Soils and Terrain). There have been some updates in these reference books since the field descriptions were carried out.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following people:
  • Andrew McLennan, Shari McConachy and Doug Crawford for their assistance in the field;
  • Becky McCain and the Heystesbury Landcare Network committee;
  • Austin Brown and Nerissa Lovric for their support and advice; and,
  • The land holders for allowing us onto their properties.
Page top