Your gateway to a wide range of natural resources information and associated maps

Victorian Resources Online

Impact Assessment - Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) in Victoria (Nox)

Back | Table | Feedback

Assessment of plant invasiveness is done by evaluating biological and ecological characteristics such as germination requirements, growth rate, competitive ability, reproduction methods and dispersal mechanisms. Assessment of plant impacts, however, is determined by the extent to which a plant affects a land manager’s environmental, economic and social resources.

The relative importance of these resources varies depending upon the value people place on them and, as such, the assessment process is subjective. For example, a farmer is likely to place a higher emphasis on the impact of a plant on production (economic resource) than its impact on areas of natural vegetation occurring on the farm. Conversely, a Landcare or Friends group would value environmental or social resources more than economic resources.

Recognising that the value of resources vary between different land tenures, plant impact assessments allow a prioritisation of resources by land managers. Assessments can apply at a local, regional or state level, and the relative values of each resource identified may differ at each level.

The impact assessment method used in the Victorian Pest Plant Prioritisation Process uses three broad resource categories: social, environmental and agricultural, each with a number of related attributes. For example, social resources include such attributes as how the plant affects human access for recreation, or if it creates a health risk due to toxicity or by producing allergens.

Each resource attribute, or criterion, is assessed relative to a list of intensity ratings. Depending upon information found in relation to each criterion, a rating of Low, Medium Low, Medium High or High is assigned. Descriptions of the impact criteria and intensity ratings used in this process can be viewed here.

The following table provides information on the impact of Fennel

A more detailed description of the methodology of the Victorian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) method can be viewed below:

Victorian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) method (PDF - 630 KB)
Victorian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) method (DOC - 1 MB)
To view the information PDF requires the use of a PDF reader. This can be installed for free from the Adobe website (external link).

Common Name: Fennel
Scientific name: Foeniculum vulgare

Question
Comments
Reference
Rating
Recreation
1. Restrict human access?An erect multi-stemmed perennial herb commonly 1.5 to 2.0 metres high. It is found along waterways, drainage lines and in seasonally moist locations within grasslands and woodlands. Dense infestations may restrict access to waterways. A soft, herbaceous plant the high growth of the plant may be a nuisance to people.
ML
2. Reduce tourism?Dense infestations along waterways may restrict some recreational activities.
Muyt (2001)
MH
3. Injurious to people?The National Occupational Health and Safety Commission documents F. vulgare as causing photosensitivity through skin contact with the plant or its juices.
NOHSC1
ML
4. Damage to cultural sites?Not an aggressive root system; structure not affected. Dense infestations would create have a moderate negative visual effect.
Muyt (2001)
ML
Abiotic
5. Impact flow?Terrestrial species.
L
6. Impact water quality?Terrestrial species.
P & C (2001)
L
7. Increase soil erosion?A perennial herb that in dense infestations eliminates most other ground flora, but retains good ground cover. It has a stout branched taproot to around 1 metre deep with many laterals. Not likely to contribute to soil erosion.
P & C (2001)
Muyt (2001)
L
8. Reduce biomass?Grows mostly in open, disturbed areas, such as roadside, railway easements, channels and drains. Minor effect on biomass. Dense infestations may increase biomass.
P & C (2001)
ML
9. Change fire regime?Flower stems partly die back in winter. Images of dense infestations show increased dry matter. Possible minor increase to the frequency of fire risk.
P & C (2001)
TNC2
ML
Community Habitat
10. Impact on composition
(a) high value EVC
EVC=Plains grassland (E); CMA=West Gippsland; Bioreg=Highlands – Southern Falls; VH CLIMATE potential
“Grows best in open, unshaded situations. Once established, fennel excludes almost all other vegetation.” Major displacement of species within different strata.
P & C (2001)
MH
(b) medium value EVCEVC=Shrubby woodland (R); CMA=Corangamite; Bioreg=Central Victorian Uplands; VH CLIMATE potential
Impact as in 10(a) above. Population density may be limited due to overstorey cover.
P & C (2001)
MH
(c) low value EVCEVC=Heathy woodland (LC); CMA=Port Phillip; Bioreg=Gippsland Plain; VH CLIMATE potential
Impact as in 10(b) above.
P & C (2001)
MH
11. Impact on structure?“Dense infestations eliminate most other ground-flora and severely impede overstorey regeneration.” Major effect on ground flora.
Muyt (2001)
ML
12. Effect on threatened flora?12. Effect on threatened flora?
Fauna
13. Effect on threatened fauna?
14. Effect on non-threatened fauna?While livestock may find the plant palatable, its widespread distribution in medium to large populations suggests that native fauna do not significantly graze on it. With its dominant nature, it is likely to reduce habitat.
MH
15. Benefits fauna?No documented benefits.
H
16. Injurious to fauna?“Apparently animals graze the fennel stubble without ill effects.” Not known to cause injury to native fauna.
P & C (2001)
L
Pest Animal
17. Food source to pests?No evidence of the plant providing food to pest species.
L
18. Provides harbor?Dense infestations may provide harbor for minor pests such as rodents.
L
Agriculture
19. Impact yield?Not a serious weed of pasture or cropping. “It does not establish in grazed pastures or cultivated paddocks. Herb growers note that tomatoes and beans do not grow in association with fennel, suggesting possible allelopathic effect.” Likely to have some effect in those situations.
P & C (2001)
ML
20. Impact quality?Not a serious weed of pasture or cropping. “When growing on headlands of arable crops, seedlings often occur in the crops.” Minor impact on quality through seed contamination.
P & C (2001)
ML
21. Affect land value?Not a serious weed of pasture or cropping. Not likely to affect land value.
P & C (2001)
L
22. Change land use?Not a serious weed of pasture or cropping. Land use not affected.
P & C (2001)
L
23. Increase harvest costs?No increase in harvest costs.
L
24. Disease host/vector?None evident.
L

This table can also be viewed as a PDF document (printer friendly).

Impact Assessment Record - Fennel (PDF - 34KB)
Impact Assessment Record - Fennel (DOC - 62KB)
To view the information PDF requires the use of a PDF reader. This can be installed for free from the Adobe website (external link).

Feedback

Do you have additional information about this plant that will improve the quality of the assessment?
If so, we would value your contribution. Click on the link to go to the feedback form.
Page top