Your gateway to a wide range of natural resources information and associated maps

Victorian Resources Online

Impact Assessment - Cotton thistle (Onopordum nervosum) in Victoria

Back | Table | Feedback

Assessment of plant invasiveness is done by evaluating biological and ecological characteristics such as germination requirements, growth rate, competitive ability, reproduction methods and dispersal mechanisms. Assessment of plant impacts, however, is determined by the extent to which a plant affects a land manager’s environmental, economic and social resources.

The relative importance of these resources varies depending upon the value people place on them and, as such, the assessment process is subjective. For example, a farmer is likely to place a higher emphasis on the impact of a plant on production (economic resource) than its impact on areas of natural vegetation occurring on the farm. Conversely, a Landcare or Friends group would value environmental or social resources more than economic resources.

Recognising that the value of resources vary between different land tenures, plant impact assessments allow a prioritisation of resources by land managers. Assessments can apply at a local, regional or state level, and the relative values of each resource identified may differ at each level.

The impact assessment method used in the Victorian Pest Plant Prioritisation Process uses three broad resource categories: social, environmental and agricultural, each with a number of related attributes. For example, social resources include such attributes as how the plant affects human access for recreation, or if it creates a health risk due to toxicity or by producing allergens.

Each resource attribute, or criterion, is assessed relative to a list of intensity ratings. Depending upon information found in relation to each criterion, a rating of Low, Medium Low, Medium High or High is assigned. Descriptions of the impact criteria and intensity ratings used in this process can be viewed here.

The following table provides information on the impact of Cotton thistle

A more detailed description of the methodology of the Victorian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) method can be viewed below:

Victorian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) method (PDF - 630 KB)
Victorian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) method (DOC - 1 MB)
To view the information PDF requires the use of a PDF reader. This can be installed for free from the Adobe website (external link).


Common Name: Cotton thistle
Scientific name: Onopordum nervosum

Question
Comments
Rating
Confidence
Recreation
1. Restrict human access?No information about the extent of infestations of this plant was found.
M
L
2. Reduce tourism?Flowers purplish-pink on thorny plants (ENG, 2002) up to 2.7 m (Tutin, 1980) are likely to be very obvious to the average visitor and have a moderate visual effect. The density of infestations is not known so more serious impacts may be possible, but are not known.
M
L
3. Injurious to people?The stems are spinose-winged, …and the involucral bracts spine-tipped (Tutin, 1980; ENG, 2002). Spines on the infloresence stems may cause some damage at most times of the year.
MH
MH
4. Damage to cultural sites?Flowers purplish-pink on thorny plants (ENG, 2002) up to 2.7 m (Tutin, 1980) are likely to be very obvious to the average visitor and have a moderate visual effect.
ML
ML
Abiotic
5. Impact flow?Most species grow in rocky or stony ground, roadsides, waste places and similar dry, open habitats (Tutin, 1980). Terrestrial species.
L
MH
6. Impact water quality?Most species grow in rocky or stony ground, roadsides, waste places and similar dry, open habitats (Tutin, 1980). Terrestrial species.
L
MH
7. Increase soil erosion?Biennial species (Tutin, 1980) that may leave large bare patches after it dies off, however the extent of infestations is unknown.
M
L
8. Reduce biomass?Invades rocky or stony ground, roadsides, waste places and similar dry, open habitats (Tutin, 1980). In this type of vegetation, the plant is likely to replace other herbaceous species.
ML
H
9. Change fire regime?Post senescence “stems can persist into the next season with spiny phyllaries and receptacles attached” (Healy, Enroe & DiTomaso, 2005). In dry, open habitats, where this plant invades (Tutin, 1980) this dried vegetation adds to the fuel load, most likely causing a moderate increase in the intensity of fires.
MH
MH
Community Habitat
10. Impact on composition
(a) high value EVC
EVC=Plains grassland (BCS = E) CMA=Mallee; Bioreg=Lowan Mallee; CLIMATE potential=VH.
Species has potential to occur in high value EVC although impact on composition unknown. Score medium.
M
L
(b) medium value EVCEVC=Chenopod grassland (BCS = D) CMA=Mallee; Bioreg=Lowan Mallee; CLIMATE potential=VH.
Species has potential to occur in medium value EVC although impact on composition unknown. Score medium.
M
L
(c) low value EVCEVC=Dunefield heathland (BCS = C) CMA=Mallee; Bioreg=Lowan Mallee; CLIMATE potential=VH.
Species has potential to occur in low value EVC although impact on composition unknown. Score medium.
M
L
11. Impact on structure?No information was found about the density of infestations.
M
L
12. Effect on threatened flora?No information found.
MH
L
Fauna
13. Effect on threatened fauna?No information found.
MH
L
14. Effect on non-threatened fauna?No information found.
MH
L
15. Benefits fauna?The structure of this spiny plant (as seen in BBG, 2006) is unlikely to provide harbour or food to desirable fauna species.
H
ML
16. Injurious to fauna?The stems are spinose-winged…and the involucral bracts spine-tipped (Tutin, 1980). Spines on the infloresence and stems may cause some damage at most times of the year.
MH
MH
Pest Animal
17. Food source to pests?The stems are spinose-winged…and the involucral bracts spine-tipped (Tutin, 1980). Spines on the infloresence and stems would deter herbivory by vertebrate species.
L
MH
18. Provides harbor?The structure of this spiny plant (as seen in BBG, 2006) is unlikely to provide harbour to pest animals.
L
ML
Agriculture
19. Impact yield?No information about the invasiveness of this plant was found.
M
L
20. Impact quality?No information about the invasiveness of this plant was found.
M
L
21. Affect land value?No information about the invasiveness of this plant was found.
M
L
22. Change land use?No information about the invasiveness of this plant was found.
M
L
23. Increase harvest costs?No information about the invasiveness of this plant was found.
M
L
24. Disease host/vector?No information about disease host/vector of this plant was found, however there was very little information available about this species.
M
L

This table can also be viewed as a PDF document (printer friendly).

Impact Assessment Record - Cotton thistle (PDF - 69KB)
Impact Assessment Record - Cotton thistle (DOC - 49KB)
To view the information PDF requires the use of a PDF reader. This can be installed for free from the Adobe website (external link).

Feedback

Do you have additional information about this plant that will improve the quality of the assessment?
If so, we would value your contribution. Click on the link to go to the feedback form.
Page top